What every Pinaka mock
ends with.
The page a student sees the moment they finish a mock. The score, the skill map, the next three drills. Three full explanations from this same mock, expanded.
Numbers are illustrative, not aggregate.
You lost 5 points to RC inference traps, not to LR. Start with the inference-trap drill.
Caution-as-preference traps. Distortion patterns in RC inference options.
Out-of-passage detail traps. Recall accuracy under timing pressure.
Function-of-paragraph attribution. Confusing role with content.
Same shape, every question.
Below: three of this mock's 75 explanations. One Flaw (wrong answer), one Strengthen (correct), one Reading inference (wrong). Same five-band readout each time. Diagnostic, not summary.
Maya argues that the inventory-forecasting tool used at Pinaka Books cannot be responsible for last quarter's stockouts. The tool, she explains, is just an algorithm that outputs whatever it is given; therefore the errors lie entirely with Sam, who entered the sales data.
The argument above is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?
Maya slides from "the tool has no agency" to "the tool contributed nothing." Tools with built-in assumptions still shape outputs. Option (D) names the slide.
This is a Flaw question, specifically equivocation. Maya’s argument: the tool just outputs what it gets, so the error is on Sam. The structural gap: tools embed assumptions and can shape errors independently of inputs. Look for the option that names this leap.
For Flaw questions, the right answer captures the conceptual conflation that licenses the conclusion. Real-world worries and side issues are common traps; structural diagnosis is the target.
60-90 seconds. Cut (B) and (C) on out-of-scope quickly. (A) and (E) are real-world worries that do not name the structural leap. (D) is the only structural answer.
Maya cites a recent industry survey: bookstores in the District that added café sections last year saw a 12% increase in weekday foot traffic. Maya argues this supports her proposal to add a café section at Pinaka Books to raise weekday foot traffic.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens Maya’s argument?
Maya argues by analogy from the surveyed bookstores to Pinaka. (A) tightens the analogy by confirming the surveyed bookstores resemble Pinaka in a structurally relevant way.
Identify Maya’s argument structure: analogy from surveyed bookstores to Pinaka Books. A strengthener tightens the analogy. Match each option to the metric in the conclusion: weekday foot traffic.
Analogy strengtheners confirm structural parallel between source and target. Options that match the topic but not the metric are the most common trap.
60-90 seconds. Eliminate (C) and (E) on out-of-scope. (B) and (D) are revenue-not-traffic decoys. (A) is the structural match.
Passage · 3 paragraphstoggle
At Pinaka Books on Pennsylvania Avenue, owner Maya tested three pricing strategies in different sections last quarter. The fiction section used full-retail prices. The history section offered subscribers a 10% discount. The legal-reference section used dynamic prices that adjusted weekly based on demand.
After three months, fiction sales were unchanged. History sales rose 8%, but the lift came almost entirely from existing subscribers; new-subscriber growth was negligible. Legal-reference sales rose 4% and held steady regardless of price changes; legal-reference customers, Maya observed, treat price as a secondary factor when buying technical materials.
Maya is now considering which model to expand store-wide. Sam has argued for the subscriber-discount model on the grounds that it produced the largest sales lift. Maya is more cautious. She notes that the lift came from existing subscribers rather than new ones, and that the legal-reference data suggests price may not be the strongest lever for sales in every section.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information in the passage?
Sam’s stated rationale ("it produced the largest sales lift") implies size of lift is his criterion. Option (C) names what his rationale implies.
Inference questions reward what the passage strictly supports. Find the option whose claim is anchored in a specific passage statement. Sam’s stated rationale is the anchor for (C).
Distinguish what the passage says from what it suggests. Inference is supported, not implied. Caution is not preference. Lift-size as rationale is what is stated.
75-100 seconds. Eliminate (D) and (E) on unsupported. (A) trades caution for preference. (B) overstates. (C) is anchored in Sam’s rationale.
This page is sample. The real one has your number.
Take a full LSAT. See your scaled score, your skill map, and your top three drills. One drill, free.
Take the free LSAT mock2h 20m · ~75 scored questions · no card required.