Skip to content
Pinaka
Take a free mock
Taught by testing

Know what to fix.
Hit your number.

Pinaka runs a full-length LSAT-format mock, reads what happened, and tells you the 21 subskills where your points are going.

The plan you will actually study from. No drift.

Free. No card required. Score and skill map at the end.

Sample readout · what every mock ends with
166±2
120140160180

For example: “You lost 5 pointsto RC inference traps, not to LR. Start with the inference-trap drill.”

The anti-anxiety stance, by design
  • No streaks. No badges. No leaderboards.
  • No countdown timers, no manufactured urgency.
  • No red until the final five minutes of a section.
  • The student decides the rhythm. Not the product.
Skill map · 21 LSAT subskills · sample readoutweakest · drill first
FLRC-INF
NASASTWKFLINPRPXPAMPMORROLEPDPOARC-MAINRC-PURRC-DETRC-INFRC-ATTRC-FUNCRC-COMP
Your skill map · 20 of 21 above 50%RC-INF is your largest gap
Full mockLSAT format, real timing
2h 20mFour sections, 35 min each
~75 qTwo LR, one RC, one variable
< 7sScore reveal latency
How it works

The whole loop.

Pinaka is one loop. Test, diagnose, drill, retest. No lectures to watch, no workbooks to buy, no class to enroll in. The product is the entire pipeline.

012h 20m · real test format

Take a full LSAT under real timing.

Four sections, 35 minutes each. Two LR, one RC, one variable. Around 75 scored questions, plus the unscored experimental.

02mock score · 21 subskill nodes

See your scaled score and the skill map.

Raw correct count maps to a 120-180 mock score using public LSAC conversion tables. The skill map names which of 21 subskills lost you points.

03free drill · one weakness

Pick one weakness and drill it.

Pinaka surfaces your top three weakest nodes. Pick one. A drill set is built from the drill pool. The engine does not repeat questions you have seen recently.

The readout

Every wrong answer, named.

Pinaka does not deliver an answer key. Every wrong answer has a structural pattern. The walkthrough names it: the short answer, the diagnosis of every option, the approach, the take-home, the timing. Same shape, every question.

WrongQuestion 14 of 75FLSection 1LR · Flaw · equivocation

Maya argues that the inventory-forecasting tool used at Pinaka Books cannot be responsible for last quarter's stockouts. The tool, she explains, is just an algorithm that outputs whatever it is given; therefore the errors lie entirely with Sam, who entered the sales data.

The argument above is most vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds?

(A)It overlooks the possibility that Sam had limited time to validate input data.Your answer
(B)It does not address why Maya selected this particular forecasting tool.
(C)It fails to consider that other independent bookstores may use similar tools.
(D)It treats the tool's lack of independent agency as sufficient grounds for denying that the tool itself, including its internal assumptions, contributed to the inaccurate predictions.Correct
(E)It assumes that Sam received the same training on data preparation as other employees.
Wrong
You picked (A). The correct answer is (D).
Short answer

Maya slides from "the tool has no agency" to "the tool contributed nothing." Tools with built-in assumptions still shape outputs. Option (D) names the slide.

01Per-option diagnosis
(A)out_of_scopeTime pressure is an empirical worry, not the structural flaw. A real concern that does not name the inferential leap.
(B)out_of_scopeTool selection is a meta question and does not address the argument’s logic.
(C)out_of_scopeOther bookstores’ tools are not the topic. External comparisons are a common trap.
(D)correctNames the conflation: lack of agency treated as sufficient for zero contribution, ignoring the tool’s internal assumptions.
(E)distortionTraining shifts the source of error to people. The argument’s structural problem is about the tool, not who fed it data.
02Approach

This is a Flaw question, specifically equivocation. Maya’s argument: the tool just outputs what it gets, so the error is on Sam. The structural gap: tools embed assumptions and can shape errors independently of inputs. Look for the option that names this leap.

03Take-home

For Flaw questions, the right answer captures the conceptual conflation that licenses the conclusion. Real-world worries and side issues are common traps; structural diagnosis is the target.

04Timing

60-90 seconds. Cut (B) and (C) on out-of-scope quickly. (A) and (E) are real-world worries that do not name the structural leap. (D) is the only structural answer.

Drill this skill
Flaw
See your shape
Skill map
Every one of Pinaka's 21 LSAT subskills gets the same walkthrough structure.Browse LSAT skills →
Beta · open now

Try free. Decide after the readout.

The full LSAT mock is free. One drill set on your weakest skill is free. We are not collecting payment yet. We are collecting interest in the paid plans.

Start here · free

One full LSAT. One drill. Free.

Four sections at 35 minutes each. Two LR, one RC, one variable. Scaled 120-180 mock score in seconds. Skill map. Pick one of your top three weaknesses to drill, free.

Take the free LSAT mock2h 20m · ~75 scored questions · no card
Pinaka backers
Lifetime founding250 seats total · closes when sold
$250one-time · lifetime access

The lowest the price will ever be. Locked in at every future tier we ship. Never re-offered after the cap.

By submitting, you agree to receive launch updates from Pinaka. We do not sell or share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Intent only. No card now.

Beta monthly
$25/month$40 at GA

Beta rate, held for the founding window. Cancel anytime. Beta subscribers keep $25 for 6 months after GA, then auto-convert to $40 per month with 30 days notice.

By submitting, you agree to receive launch updates from Pinaka. We do not sell or share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.

Intent only. No card now.

Sunday Analysis
One LSAT trap pattern. Every Sunday.

The trap pattern behind one LSAT-format question. Read time five to eight minutes. No promo content.

By subscribing, you agree to receive the Sunday Analysis newsletter from Pinaka. We do not sell or share your email. Unsubscribe from any issue.

What Pinaka does not do

A list, written down so we cannot drift.

The product is defined by what it refuses as much as by what it ships. Read this before deciding whether Pinaka is for you.

No streaks.
No badges, XP, leaderboards.
No daily push notifications.
No countdown timers on pricing pages.
No manufactured urgency.
No "left in your cart" emails.
No AI tutor during a mock.
No upsell pop-ups during a session.
No share-this-score buttons.
No third-party ad pixels.
No score guarantees.
No lecture libraries.
No fake instructors, stock-photo coaches.
No the founder on the landing page.
No dark patterns.

Pinaka's brand voice is inseparable from these refusals. Read the full doctrine on the principles page.

Subscribe

Get one analysis a week.

The trap pattern behind one LSAT-format question. Read time five to eight minutes. No promo content. Unsubscribe in one click.

By subscribing, you agree to receive the Sunday Analysis newsletter from Pinaka. We do not sell or share your email. Unsubscribe from any issue.

Pinaka does not sell or rent your email. We do not share it with third parties for their own marketing.

Start

One free LSAT mock.
One score. One next step.

Full timing. Skill map at the end. One free drill on your weakest skill. No card required.

Take the free LSAT mock

Founding membership is 250 seats. The $250 price closes when the cap is reached and is never re-offered.